Legal Opinion

Henry E. Billingsley v. Richard L. MacKay

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 4, 1967No. 22996Published

1Opinion of the Court

382 F.2d 290

Henry E. BILLINGSLEY, Appellant,

v.

Richard L. MACKAY, Appellee.

No. 22996.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

July 5, 1967, Rehearing Denied Aug. 4, 1967.

Sol Goodell, Dallas, Tex., for appellant, Thompson, Knight, Simmons & Bullion, Dallas, Tex., of counsel.

Philip I. Palmer, Jr., Dallas, Tex., for appellee, Palmer, Green, Palmer & Gilmore, Dallas, Tex., of counsel.

Before JONES and COLEMAN, Circuit Judges, and HEEBE, District Judge.

2Per curiam

1

The appellant, Henry E. Billingsley, sued the appellee, Richard L. Mackay, upon a promissory note for $15,000 given by Mackay to B. D.…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cont'nal Natl. Bk. of Ft. Worth v. ConnerTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Commonwealth Bank & Trust Co. of San Antonio v. LimburgerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Ed. Steves & Sons, Inc. v. LippmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  4. Henry E. Billingsley v. Richard L. MacKayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API