Legal Opinion

Barker v. Muehler

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1909No. 8380PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Shackleford, J., entered February 13, 1909, in favor of the defendant, dismissing an action to foreclose a tax certificate, after a trial before the court without a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, C. J.

On the 11th day of November, 1896, the county treasurer of Pierce county issued to one O. W. Wahlgren a certificate of tax sale in the following words:

“I, Jno. B. Hedges, treasurer for and within said county, do hereby certify that pursuant to an order of sale to me directed and delivered, issued out of the superior court of the state of Washington, holding terms at Tacoma, in and for said county, on the 11th day of May A. D. 1896, upona real estate tax judgment rendered in said court on the 11th day of May, A. D. 1896, in favor of the state of Washington, and against the hereinafter…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hull v. State ex rel. RollinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
  2. Brown v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Harris v. LevyWashington Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moore v. OtisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  2. Perryman v. City Home BuildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Trumbull v. BruceWashington Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API