Legal Opinion

Bell-Wayland Co. v. Miller-Mitscher Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 8, 1913No. 2284PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from County Court, Pottawatomie County; A. M. Baldwin, Special Judge. Action by the Bell-Wayland Company against G. P. Wilson. The Miller-Mitscher Company intervenes'. Judgment for intervener, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PIARRISON, C.

This action grew out of conflicting claims against a stock of merchandise owned by one G. P. Wilson. Wilson was indebted to one W. E. Caudle on promissory notes aggregating $185 secured by chattel mortgage on his stock of merchandise. He also owed $101.98 to the BellWayland and $226 to the Miller-Mitscher Company on accounts. The mortgage was executed on the 26th, and filed on the 27th, day of January, 1909. On May 5, 1909, the Bell-Wayland Company brought suit in the justice court and attached Wilson’s stock of goods. But, before the order of attachment was served,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hixon v. HubbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
  2. Moore v. CalvertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  3. Dodder v. MoberlySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Ellis v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Nichols & Shepard Co. v. BishopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Negim & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Hart v. GroveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Smith v. Southwestern Engraving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Degenhart v. CartierMontana Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Garry v. Musselshell Mercantile Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API