Legal Opinion
Claim of Feisthamel v. Marcy Correctional Facility
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 2, 2006PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed August 13, 2004, which ruled that claimant did not violate Workers’ Compensation Law § 114-a.
This case involves the issue of whether claimant violated Workers’ Compensation Law § 114-a by making a misrepresentation of material fact. After development of the record, a workers’ compensation law judge found that there had been no such misrepresentation. Upon review, the Workers’ Compensation Board affirmed and this appeal ensued.
The Board’s determination regarding a violation of Workers’ Compensation Law § 114-a will be upheld if…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Claim of Phelps v. PhelpsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Claim of Passari v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Claim of Amster v. New York City Sheriff's OfficeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by7 opinions
- Claim of McKenzie v. Revere Copper ProductsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Claim of Elmer v. Marocchi Trucking Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Claim of Petit v. Syracuse Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Matter of Cirrincione v. Scissors WizardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Matter of Dacey v. Sweeteners Plus, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.