Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. Hill's Food Stores, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 16, 1988No. 8713SC270PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

The question presented for review is whether the trial court erred in allowing defendant’s summary judgment motion. For the reasons that follow we affirm.

On motions for summary judgment, the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with affidavits, must show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. N.C. Gen. Stat. sec. 1A-1, Rule 56(c) (1983); Stanley v. Walker, 55 N.C. App. 377, 285 S.E. 2d 297 (1982). The moving party has the burden of establishing the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brenner v. Little Red School House, Ltd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Wrenn v. Hillcrest Convalescent Home, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Morgan v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Southerland v. KappCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Frendlich v. Vaughan's Foods of Henderson, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grayson v. High Point Development Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  2. Kelly v. Regency Centers Corp. ex rel. Registered Agent Corp. Service Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  3. Wyrick v. K-MART APPAREL FASHIONS CORP.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Kelly v. REGENCY CENTERS CORP.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. Pulley v. Rex HospitalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API