Lytle v. Ford Motor Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge.
Appellant-plaintiff Steven Lytle appeals the trial court’s order granting appellee-de-fendant Ford Motor Company’s (Ford) motion for summary judgment. Specifically, Lytle argues that the trial court erred as *467follows: 1) excluding evidence of Kyong Ly-tle’s seat belt use; 2) concluding that Lytle had abandoned his theory regarding inadvertent release; and 3) excluding the testimony of Lytle’s expert witnesses.
FACTS1
On August 31, 1987, Lytle, his wife Kyong and their daughter Michelle were riding in their 1987 Ford Ranger pickup truck when it was struck by another vehicle.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- McGrew v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Hottinger v. Trugreen Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Corbin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Desmond Turner v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
- Markley Enterprises, Inc. v. GroverIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Hannan v. Pest Control Services, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Indiana Michigan Power Co. v. RungeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Lytle v. Ford Motor Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.