Legal Opinion

Harnett v. Edmonston, Dir.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1932No. 2153PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKunkle, J.

An issue was thus joined by the pleadings.

The plaintiff brings this suit as a tax payer and also brings the suit as the President of The Buckeye Blower Company, a company engaged in the manufacture of ventilating appliances in competition with the Hernelco System. He also states in his petition that he brings the suit in behalf of all others similarly situated. The averments of the petition clearly show the capacities in which plaintiff sues. The third paragraph of the second page of the petition sets forth clearly that he is suing as an individual tax payer and as President of The Buckeye…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Slezak v. OusdigianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  2. City of Columbus Ex Rel. Willits v. CremeanOhio Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Caton v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  4. State Ex Rel. Masterson v. Ohio State Racing CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API