Legal Opinion

Pederson v. Paragon Pool Enterprises

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 24, 1991No. 1-90-1049PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice LaPORTA

Plaintiff Lyle Pederson appeals an order granting defendant Paragon Pool Enterprises’ motion for summary judgment on the ground that Paragon Pool Enterprises did not manufacture, sell or install the pool and filter system which allegedly caused plaintiff’s injury.

Plaintiff raises two issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial court erred in holding that defendant Paragon Pool Enterprises, Inc., was not liable as a matter of law for the installation of the pool or filter which caused plaintiff’s injury; and (2) whether Paragon’s 4V2-year delay in asserting its defense barred or estopped it from…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pyne v. WitmerIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Murphy v. UrsoIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Main Bank of Chicago v. BakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Bell v. Louisville & NashVille RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Bevelheimer v. GierachAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Sea-Land Services, Inc. v. The Pepper Source, Caribe Crown, Inc., Gerald Marchese Doing Business as Jamar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Tower Investors, LLC v. 111 East Chestnut Consultants, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  3. Hystro Products, Inc. v. Mnp CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  4. Hecny Transportation, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. George Chu, and Daisy Chu, Platinum International Logistics, Inc., and Wilfredo JamilosaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  5. In Re Estate of WallenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API