United States Ex Rel. Keith v. Sioux Nation Shopping Center
District Court, D. South Dakota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BOGUE, District Judge.
This action was brought under 25 U.S.C. § 264 against 128 defendants. Summary judgment was granted to eight of the defendants, so 120 remain. The plaintiff is a qui tam litigant acting under the authority of 25 U.S.C. § 201. 1
Due to the extremely large number of defendants in this case, this court decided to sever the trials of groups of defendants. On December 14, 1979, the trial of five of the defendants was held. On February 8, 1980, an additional 22 of the defendants were tried. And finally, on April 4, 1980, a hearing was held to take additional…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rockbridge v. LincolnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. PartonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
- Emerson v. Mary Lincoln Candies, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1940
- Alabama Optometric Ass'n v. Alabama State Board of HealthDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1974
- United States v. Certain PropertyArizona Supreme Court · 1871
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Laguna Industries, Inc. v. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
- United States of America Ex Rel. C. Hobart Keith v. Sioux Nation Shopping CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Laguna Industries, Inc. v. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
- Laguna Industries, Inc. v. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992