Legal Opinion

United States v. Certain Property

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1871PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By Court,

Titus, C. J.:

This proceeding wras instituted July 29, 1871, by petition and information, in the district court of the first judicial district of Arizona, for the condemnation of certain merchandise, therein described, alleged to have been forfeited and seized as such, June 20, 1871, near the reservation of the Pima and Maricopa Indians, by Capt. Frederick E. Grossman, special Indian agent, on a charge of illegal traffic with the said Indians.

On the twenty-first of October last, William Birchard & Co. w'ere, on their petition and claim as sole owners, permitted to defend the said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sundry Goods, Wares & Merchandises v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  2. United States v. HollidaySupreme Court of the United States · 1866

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Ray v. MartinNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  2. Gila River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  3. Tubby v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1976
  4. United States Ex Rel. Keith v. Sioux Nation Shopping CenterDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1980
  5. Peters v. Pauma School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API