Legal Opinion
Haag v. Barnes
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 29, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.
This paternity proceeding was instituted pursuant to section 64 of the New York City Criminal Courts Act. The complaint was dismissed on motion on the ground that a contract previously entered into between the parties, in Illinois, was a bar to this proceeding. Complainant appeals from such determination.
Complainant, then and since 1947 a resident of New York, met defendant, a resident of Illinois, in 1954. At that time complainant was employed as a law secretary. Acquaintance ripened into friendship and, complainant alleges, from and as a result of the association a child was born to her in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Auten v. AutenNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- F. A. Straus & Co. v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- People v. . MartinNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Rhyne v. KatlemanNew York Court of Special Session · 1954
- Rhyne v. KatlemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
3Cited by2 opinions
- Warner v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Ellen N. v. Stuart K.New York City Family Court · 1976