Legal Opinion

Ling v. Bell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 4, 1974No. 7427DC482PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

In Roberts v. Freight Carriers, 273 N.C. 600, 606, 160 S.E. 2d 712 (1968), the Supreme Court set forth the rule for damages for the loss of use of a vehicle.

“When a vehicle is negligently damaged, if it can be economically repaired, the plaintiff will also be entitled to recover such special damages as he has properly pleaded and proven for the loss of its use during the time he was necessarily deprived of it. Trucking Co. v. Payne, 233 N.C. 637, 65 S.E. 2d 132. See also Binder v. Acceptance Corp., 222 N.C. 512, 23 S.E. 2d 894.”

This right to recover for loss of use is limited to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Binder v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Reliable Trucking Co. v. PayneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Martin v. HareCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Gillespie v. DraughnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Hannah v. BrownCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  4. Amerson v. WillisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API