Legal Opinion

United States v. Armando Padilla, United States of America v. William Chippas, United States of America v. James Percheitte

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 23, 1989No. 87-2434, 87-2435, 87-2457, 88-1937, 88-1996 and 88-1997PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

Armando Padilla, William Chippas, and James Percheitte bring this appeal from their convictions and sentences under the federal narcotics statutes. Each defendant was indicted for distribution of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. After a week-long trial, the jury found each of the defendants guilty on both counts of the indictment. We affirm these convictions in all respects.

In sentencing the defendants, the District Court gave effect to a jury finding concerning the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Gozlon-Peretz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Sam Paiz, Douglas Rector, Dick Selby, Leann Cooper, Joe Rector, Barbara Allen, and Tim RectorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Alfreda BarnesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Erin Dale HouseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API