Dennis v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
LUMPKIN, Vice-Presiding Judge:
concurs in part/dissents in part.
¶ 1 I concur in the Court’s decision to affirm the judgment and sentence in this ease. However, I cannot join in the Court’s lack of discipline as evidenced by its failure to adhere to the doctrine of stare decisis. The Court improperly interprets the Oklahoma Constitution based on a whimsical desire to invoke the constitutional fiat to reach a desired result rather than adhering to a long established logical progression of case law.
¶ 2 The issue in this case concerns a defendant’s right to counsel during custodial interrogation,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.