United States ex rel. Purcell v. MWI Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Ruling for the Government on the Privilege Issue; Adopting the Defendants’ Alternative Proposal for the Protective Order
I. INTRODUCTION
This qui tam action comes before the court on a discovery dispute. Because the initial work-product dispute raises a novel question of law, the court provides an in-depth explanation of its reasoning.
Robert Purcell (“the relator”) brings this case pursuant to the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733. As is its option pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(4), the government intervened in this action and now brings…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Crandon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Head v. Kane Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- United States Ex Rel. Purcell v. MWI Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Ferko v. National Ass'n for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2003
- United States ex rel. Bagley v. TRW Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc. v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.