Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Purcell v. MWI Corp.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 26, 2002No. Civ.A. 98-2088(RMU)PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

URBINA, District Judge.

Ruling for the Government on the Privilege Issue; Adopting the Defendants’ Alternative Proposal for the Protective Order

I. INTRODUCTION

This qui tam action comes before the court on a discovery dispute. Because the initial work-product dispute raises a novel question of law, the court provides an in-depth explanation of its reasoning.

Robert Purcell (“the relator”) brings this case pursuant to the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733. As is its option pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(4), the government intervened in this action and now brings…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Crandon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Head v. Kane Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  2. United States Ex Rel. Purcell v. MWI Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  3. Ferko v. National Ass'n for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2003
  4. United States ex rel. Bagley v. TRW Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
  5. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc. v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API