Meikle v. Wenatchee North Central Fruit Distributors
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, C. J.
The question in this case is whether the proper service of process was made in order to give the superior court jurisdiction in an action then pending therein. It will he necessary to trace briefly *152the history of the litigation leading up to the judgment of the trial court holding that such service was insufficient, from which this appeal is prosecuted.
In October, 1919, the Umpqua Valley Fruit Union, an Oregon corporation, recovered a judgment in the sum of $1,954.32, in Spokane county, against the North Pacific Fruit Distributors, a corporation organized under the laws of this state. An…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Burns v. StolzeWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Brooks v. Orchard Land Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Wicks v. Puget Sound Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Columbia Basin Land Co. v. Peter C. Chalmers Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923