Legal Opinion

In re Sah Quah

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided May 8, 1886PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAWSON, Judge.

Petitioner alleges that he is unlawfully restrained of his liberty by the respondent, who claims to own him as a slave and chattel, and prays to be released from the restraint imposed upon him by the respondent. Respondent, by way of return to the writ, in substance alleges that both he and the petitioner are Indians of the Thlinket or Kalosian race; that they are uncivilized natives; that they and their ancestors have inhabited the Alaskan shores from time whereof the memory of man runneth not to the contrary, in communities independent of any other law, authority, or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cherokee Nation v. State of GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  2. Ex Parte Crow DogSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Metlakatla Indian Community, Annette Islands Reserve v. EganSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Atkinson v. HaldaneAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Madeline Colliflower v. John Garland, Sheriff of County of BlaineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  4. Native Village of Venetie I.R.A. Council v. AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Native Village of Stevens v. Alaska Management & PlanningAlaska Supreme Court · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API