Arko v. Cirou

BLACKBURN, Senior Appellate Judge.

In this action to collect a debt, lender Robert Arko appeals the summary judgment granted to debtors Martin and Gail Cirou, arguing that modifications to the debt instruments, although executed by him, were invalid. We agree with the trial court that because no evidence showed a confidential relationship between him and the Cirous, Arko’s decision not to read the modifications before executing them rendered such arguments meritless. Accordingly, we affirm.

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to…