Barlow Upholstery & Furniture Co. v. Emmel
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Justice:
Plaintiffs appeal from an adverse jury verdict which rejected their claims for damages for furniture and appliances which were destroyed by fire while stored in defendant’s warehouse, 736 West on Third South, in the business service area of Salt Lake City the night of July 24, 1972. They argue that there was no jury question and that they are entitled to prevail as a matter of law.
The plaintiffs, other than Westinghouse, are dealers in furniture and appliances who pool their orders from some manufacturers to avail themselves of carload rates. They have the merchandise…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hipps v. HennigSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- Memmott v. United States Fuel CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1969
- Romney v. Covey GarageUtah Supreme Court · 1941
- Ewell and Son, Inc. v. Salt Lake City CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1972
- Cole v. YoungerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Maltby v. Cox Const. Co., Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1979
- Fisher Corp. v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Dresser Industries, Inc. v. Foss Launch & Tug Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Staheli v. Farmers' Cooperative of Southern UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Winters v. Charles Anthony, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.