Legal Opinion
General Electric Co. v. Whitman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 2003No. CIV.A.00-2855(JDB)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BATES, District Judge.
Plaintiff General Electric Company (“GE”) and defendants the United States Environmental Protection Agency and its administrator, Christine Todd Whitman (collectively “EPA”), are before the Court on EPA’s motion to dismiss or for summary judgment. GE raises a broad constitutional challenge to section 106 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERC-LA” or “the Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq., and seeks a declaratory judgment that section 106, 42 U.S.C. § 9606, in tandem with sections 107(c)(3) and 113(h), 42 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- General Electric Co. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- General Electric Co. v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- City of Rialto v. West Coast Loading Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- General Electric Company v. JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.