Austin Co. v. Tillman Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOURT, J.
This is an action by the plaintiff to recover a balance alleged to be due on the purchase price of an asphalt mixing plant delivered by plaintiff to defendant and used by it. -Defendant by its answer denied that plaintiff performed the terms and conditions of the contract of sale necessary to be kept and performed by plaintiff before it was entitled to recover the purchase price named in the contract of sale. Defendant alleged affirmatively that the plant delivered was incomplete, defective and old, and was not the one described in the contract and did not correspond to the description or…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Feeney & Bremer Co. v. StoneOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Nave v. PowellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Wilson v. Nichols & Shepherd Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
- Morse v. Union Stock Yard Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1891
- Northwestern Cordage Co. v. RiceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ice Cream MacH. Co., Inc. v. Pig'n WhistleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
- Rhodes v. Libby, McNeill & LibbyOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- J. L. Latture Equipment Co. v. Gruendler Patent Crusher & Pulverizer Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1930
- Kitterman v. Eagle Pine Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Champion Brick Co. of Baltimore County v. Signode Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.