Blankenship v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION CORY BLANKENSHIP, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) NO. 3:19-cv-00146 ) JUDGE RICHARDSON METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF ) NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY, ) TENNESSEE, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment: Doc. No. 21 (“Defendant’s Motion”) and Doc. No. 24 (“Plaintiff’s Motion”).1 The parties respectively have filed responses (Doc. Nos. 30 and 32) to the other party’s motion, replies (Doc. Nos. 34 and 35) in support of the parties’ own motion, and…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Roger Monette and Doris Monette v. Electronic Data Systems CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Taft Broadcasting Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.