Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Warren

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 1, 2002No. 5D00-3064PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. (State Farm), appeals a final judgment awarded to Dan Ray Warren, State Farm’s insured, and Dr. Jack Rot-stein, M.D., Warren’s physician. The county court entered the judgment after holding section 627.736(5)(b), Florida Statutes (1999), unconstitutional as violative of Dr. Rotstein’s rights to equal protection, due process and access to the courts.1

Section 627.736(5)(b)2 provides that “the insurer is not required to pay [for] charges for treatment or services rendered more than 30 days before the postmark date of the statement [of charges]_” The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kluger v. WhiteSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  2. Lasky v. State Farm Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  3. Pinillos v. Cedars of Lebanon Hospital Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1981
  4. Mitchell v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  5. United Yacht Brokers, Inc. v. GillespieSupreme Court of Florida · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Warren v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2005
  2. Parsons v. HARBOR SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  3. Florida Atlantic University Board of Trustees v. Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API