Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Moore

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 12, 2001No. SC95299PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

786 So.2d 521 (2001)

Marshall MITCHELL, Petitioner,

v.

Michael W. MOORE, Respondent.

No. SC95299.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 12, 2001.

Rehearing Denied May 16, 2001.

Susan L. Kelsey of Holland & Knight LLP, Tallahassee, FL, for Petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Douglas T. Squire and Charlie McCoy, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, FL, for Respondent.

2Per curiam

Marshall Mitchell petitions this Court for writ of mandamus. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(8), Fla. Const.

While we recently struck down the copy requirement portion of section 57.085, Florida Statutes (1999)…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by54 opinions

  1. Westerheide v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  2. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  3. Schmidt v. CrusoeSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  4. Hernandez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
  5. Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API