Legal Opinion
Mannino v. Dir. of Revenue
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided September 18, 2018No. ED 106152PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSherri B. Sullivan, P.J.
Introduction
Michael Mannino (Appellant) appeals from the trial court's judgment upholding the administrative revocation of his driving privileges for refusing to consent to a chemical test of his breath for alcohol content pursuant to Missouri's Implied Consent Law, Section 577.041.1 ,2 We affirm.
Background
On February 7, 2016 at 9:31 p.m., St. Louis County Police Officer Michael Kiefer (Officer Kiefer) received a call for a motor vehicle accident on westbound I-270 near the Washington/Elizabeth exit. Upon his arrival at the scene, he observed a 2010 Dodge Ram off of the roadway, resting…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Florida v. JLSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Prado Navarette v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Hinnah v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- Riche v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Busby v. BonnerDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2025
- Christopher Schmitz v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2025
- Christopher Schmitz, Appellant, v. Director of Revenue, Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2025