Legal Opinion
Chapman v. Rivers Construction Company
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided September 11, 1969No. 6 Div. 420Published
1Opinion
ON REHEARING
Motion for Ten per cent damages.
Subsequent to original deliverance, Stamper has filed a motion asking that the judgment of this court be amended so as to include the ten per cent award of damages as required by § 814, Title 7, Code 1940, as amended, which, in pertinent part recites:
“When a judgment or decree is rendered for money, whether debt or damages, and the same has been superseded on appeal by the execution of bond, with surety, if the appellate court affirms the judgment of the court below, it must also render judgment against all or any of the obligors on the bond, for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. MillonasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Montgomery Light Water Power Co. v. ThombsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. GrizzardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Bashinsky, Case & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.