Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Bashinsky, Case & Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
Under the first count of the complaint, the plaintiffs assumed the burden of showing that the defendant negligently failed to promptly transmit and deliver plaintiffs’ cablegram as it undertook to do. There is nothing in the evidence that, tends to establish such negligence, unless it can be said that defendant’s use of the British Post Office telegraph service, for transmission of the message from London to Manchester over the British line, was negligence per se, under the circumstances shown.
By the express terms of the contract, defendant was authorized “to forward this message over the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Esteve Bros. & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Warren-Godwin Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Daughtery v. American Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. PriesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. CzizekSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Moody v. State Ex Rel. PayneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. CrowderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Snellings v. Builders' Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Ex Parte General Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.