Hartzell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Craig,
Does an expert medical opinion that the claimant has fully recovered and may return to his pre-injury employment constitute substantial competent evidence to uphold the referees termination of benefits where the physician, based upon a physical examination of the claimant, first opined that the disability continued, but changed his diagnosis after viewing a surveillance videotape of the claimant moving about apparently without limitation?
Claimant George Hartzell suffered a back injury on January 30, 1979, in the course of his employment at Bowen McLaughlin, York Division…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- DeBattiste v. Anthony Laudadio & SonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Kope v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Bogavich v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Mertz v. Mellon National Bank & Trust Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
3Cited by7 opinions
- Murphy v. Workers Compensation Appeal Board (Mercy Catholic Medical Center)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Sule v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Thompson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Korin v. Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Clemente-Volpe v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.