Legal Opinion

Clemente-Volpe v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 7, 1993No. 1503 C.D. 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CRAIG, President Judge.

The claimant, Mary Clemente-Volpe, appeals the determination of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board affirming a referee’s decision granting the termination petition of the employer, Westinghouse Air Brake Division. The claimant argues that the referee erred in relying upon a surveillance film of the claimant in reaching his decision, and that the board erred in affirming the referee because both the referee’s and the board’s decisions contain contradictory statements that the claimant believes justifies a remand to the board for clarification. We affirm the decision…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Estate of McGovern v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Schulz EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. John B. Kelly Co. v. DavisCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. USX Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ernst v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API