Legal Opinion
Siemens Westinghouse Power Corp. v. Dick Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 14, 2004No. 03 CIV.364 VMPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MARRERO, District Judge.
Defendant and third-party plaintiff Dick Corporation (“Dick”) moves this Court for leave to file a second amended answer and counterclaim for the purpose of, among other things, adding updated counterclaims of negligent misrepresentation and fraudulent concealment. Plaintiff Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation (“SWPC”) opposes the motion on the ground that the proposed amended filing would be futile with respect to those counterclaims. The Court agrees that those claims would not survive a motion to dismiss because they fail to sufficiently allege…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Acito v. IMCERA Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Beate Bernheim v. Jeffrey LittCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Grumman Allied Industries, Inc. And Grumman Corporation v. Rohr Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Nettis v. LevittCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Federal Insurance Company v. TYCO INTERNATIONALDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- JP Morgan Chase Bank v. WinnickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Colón Negrón v. Municipio de BayamónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2015
- Zohar CDO 2003-1, Ltd. v. Patriarch Partners, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2017
- Siemens Westinghouse Power Corp. v. Dick Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.