Legal Opinion
Theisen v. City of Dearborn
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided May 6, 1968No. Calendar 43, Docket 51,711PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBreNNAN, J.
{dissenting). Plaintiffs are retired policemen and firemen of the city of Dearborn. Their suit is for payment of retirement benefits alleged to he dne.
The Dearborn city charter provides (chap 21, §§ 21.8, 21.28, 21.37) :
“Section 21.8. ‘Average Pinal Compensation’ shall mean the average annual salary or wages paid to a member by the city for service rendered as a policeman or fireman during his last 5 years of service preceding retirement; or if he has less than 5 years service, then the average annual salary or wages paid to him by the city during his total years of service. * * *
“Section…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Theisen v. City of DearbornMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
3Cited by8 opinions
- Citizens for Pre-Trial Justice v. GoldfarbMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- Strachan v. Mutual Aid and Neigborhood Club, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Steelman v. City of PortageMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Theisen v. City of DearbornMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- Van Antwerp v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.