Seneca Co. v. Schell
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Certiorari; from Putnam superior court—Judge Park. October 26, 1917. The Seneca Company Incorporated brought suit upon an account for $16.56, in a justice’s court against S. M. Schell, doing business under the name of Phoenix Supply Company. The justice rendered, judgment in favoi of the defendant. The plaintiff obtained certiorari, which the judge of the superior court overruled on the hearing; and the plaintiff excepted.
Read the full summary
Certiorari; from Putnam superior court—Judge Park. October 26, 1917. The Seneca Company Incorporated brought suit upon an account for $16.56, in a justice’s court against S. M. Schell, doing business under the name of Phoenix Supply Company. The justice rendered, judgment in favoi of the defendant. The plaintiff obtained certiorari, which the judge of the superior court overruled on the hearing; and the plaintiff excepted. The errors complained of in the petition for certiorari are: that the judgment is contrary to law and without evidence to support.it; contrary to the evidence; that “the…
1Opinion of the CourtHarwell, J.
1. The record does not show what were the defendant’s objections, which were sustained by the trial magistrate, to the admission in evidence of the original order, or what were the plaintiff’s objections, which were overruled, to the admission of the testimony complained of. It is therefore not made to appear^ that the judge of the superior court *577erred in overruling the third and fourth grounds of the petition for certiorari.
Decided August 1, 1918. Certiorari; from Putnam superior court—Judge Park. October 26, 1917. The Seneca Company Incorporated brought suit upon an account for $16.56, in a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Toole v. Edmondson & Seay Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Schultes v. CamposCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908