Legal Opinion
Brine v. State
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided July 28, 1967PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMSON, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from the dismissal of appellant’s petition of April 1966 for Writ of Post Conviction Habeas Corpus on motion of the respondents. 14 M.R.S.A. Section 5502 et seq. The Justice below found as follows:
“I find that all matters raised in the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus should have been presented and included in his petition dated November 5, 1963. The fact that he did not do so constitutes a waiver under the statutory provisions of § 5507.
I further find that the State or Federal Constitutions do not require me to consider the instant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Brine v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1964
3Cited by9 opinions
- Younie v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
- Brine v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
- Westberry v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969
- Fletcher v. RobbinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
- Lemay v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.