Legal Opinion

State v. 1920 Studebaker Touring Car

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1926Published

1Opinion

The intervener, Nona B. Heffling, appellant here, predicates error on the court's denial of her motion to disallow O.C. Boggs as special prosecutor to represent plaintiff in this suit. Mr. Boggs was appointed special prosecutor, under the provision of Section 2224 — 45, Or. L., by the Governor. Since this suit was determined in the Circuit Court, this court has sustained that section of our statutes. Mr. Justice RAND announcing the decision in an exhaustive opinion, wrote:

"The statute does not expressly require the Governor, before acting, to make any investigation or that any fact shall…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. BombolisSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. J. W. Goldsmith, Jr.-Grant Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. United States v. SlusserDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1921

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API