Legal Opinion
Swanitz v. Wolff
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 11, 1938No. Civ. No. 10671PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
Petitioner sought a writ of mandate to compel the respondents, as members of the Civil Service Commission of the City and County of San Francisco, to make “all proper and necessary entries . . . establishing and showing that petitioner has civil service status as a hold-over assistant civil engineer”. The trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law and entered judgment denying petitioner any relief. Petitioner appeals from said judgment.
The facts are not disputed. Petitioner was duly appointed from the eligible list as an assistant civil engineer in 1913. His employment as such…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Powers v. Board of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Jones v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- McGilllicuddy v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Curtin v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Rodgers v. Board of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Orwitz v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942