Legal Opinion
Livornese v. Medical Protective Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 16, 2002No. 2:01-cv-03124PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SCHILLER, District Judge.
This action arises from a medical malpractice suit litigated in state court, resulting in a judgment entered against the current Plaintiffs: Dr. Lawrence I. Livornese, Dr. David M. Rogers, and Chestnut Hill Cardiology Consultants, Ltd. (“the Doctors”). The Doctors then commenced the instant action against their primary insurer, Defendant The Medical Protective Company (“MedPro”), for breach of contract, negligence and bad faith, based on MedPro’s conduct in the underlying litigation. MedPro subsequently impleaded Third-Party Defendants the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Morse v. Lower Merion School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terletsky v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- The Frog, Switch & Manufacturing Co., Inc., in No. 98-7552 v. The Travelers Insurance Company (d.c. Civ. No. 98-Cv-00643) the Frog, Switch & Manufacturing Co., Inc., in No. 98-7553 v. United States Fire Insurance Company (d.c. Civ. No. 98-Cv-00758)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Philadelphia Parking Authority v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Hanover Insurance v. RyanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Livornese v. Medical Protective Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Livornese v. Medical Protective Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002