Legal Opinion
Campaign for Responsible Transplantation v. United States Food & Drug Administration
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 5, 2006No. Civil Action No.: 00-2849 (RMU)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
Denying the Plaintiff’s Motion for an Award of Attorney’s Fees and Costs
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff, Campaign for Responsible Transplantation (“CRT”), is a non-profit organization dedicated to increasing awareness of the dangers of a cellular treatment therapy called xenotransplantation. CRT brought suit to compel defendant Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), to disclose documents related to clinical trials involving xenotransplantation. During the course of the litigation, the defendant voluntarily released some documents and the court…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Cynthia King v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Gilbert A. Cuneo v. Donald H. RumsfeldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Campaign for Responsible Transplantation v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Campaign for Responsible Transplantation v. U.S. Food & Drug AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Summers v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007