Legal Opinion

prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 15,330 Richard Symens Joyce Symens v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation, Ivan Sjovall v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 27, 1998No. 98-1055, 98-1056PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOKEN, Circuit Judge.

In the last half of 1992, cattle feedlot operators Richard and Joyce Symens and Ivan Sjovall vaccinated their cattle with “BoviSh-ield 4” and “Ultrabac-7/Somubac,” vaccines manufactured by SmithKline Beeeham Corporation (SBC). They commenced these diversity actions, alleging that the cattle “contracted debilitating and mortal infections and diseases” from the vaccines, and asserting South Dakota common law claims for strict liability, breach of implied warranties, false advertising, failure to warn, and fraud on the licensing agency. SBC moved for summary judgment,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. South Dakota Ex Rel. South Dakota Railroad Authority v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2003
  2. Stanton v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co., Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1999
  3. Big Stone Broadcasting, Inc. v. LindbloomDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2001
  4. Cooper v. United Vaccines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2000
  5. Roth v. I & M Rail Link, L.L.C.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2001

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API