Legal Opinion
Hartwig v. Markley (In Re Markley)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas
Decided November 29, 2011No. 19-20165PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND COUNTS AGAINST NON-DEBTOR DEFENDANTS
ROBERT D. BERGER, Bankruptcy Judge.
Plaintiffs Grant Hartwig and Adria Secord seek to except from discharge approximately $80,000 and allege the defendants fraudulently obtained and misappropriated funds Plaintiffs invested in a business. Defendants’ motion to dismiss is denied because Plaintiffs state an individual claim under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) and a derivative claim under § 523(a)(4) against Defendant Debtor Todd Markley. The claims against…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jenkins v. IBD, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2013
- Duggins v. Bratt (In re Bratt)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2013
- Horne v. Humphreys (In re James F. Humphreys & Associates, L.C.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2016
- Acrisure, LLC d/b/a Insurance Placement Alternatives v. Wright Brothers Aircraft Title, Inc., et al.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2026