Legal Opinion

Balph v. Broadhurst

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 8, 1926No. 26,672PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an action by the payee of a check against the maker. The defense .was failure of consideration and fraud which induced its execution. Tlie court sustained a demurrer to defendant’s evidence and! rendered judgment for plaintiff. The defendant has appealed.

The sole question before us is whether there was sufficient evidence in support of the defense alleged to take the case to the jury. The circumstances under which the check was given are in substance as follows: The defendant, Broadhurst, owned certain oil and gas leases, by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fontron v. KruseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  2. First National Bank v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. McMillan v. GardnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  4. Merchants' State Bank v. StreeperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Titman v. CooperNebraska Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. King v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  2. Glenn v. LukenbillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API