Adam v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACKSON, Commissioner.
Appellant entered a plea of guilty before the court to the offense of the sale of narcotics : to-wit, heroin; the court found him guilty and assessed punishment at six (6) years.
It is appellant’s contention that the evidence will not support the judgment because he says that it shows from the report of Pat Dotson, undercover agent for the San Antonio Police Department, that appellant was acting as the agent of the buyer, see Smith v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 396 S.W.2d 876.
The statement in the police report of Dotson in evidence before the court, reads:
“Today the 28th…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Soto v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Miles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Hammond v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Dinnery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Menefee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Potts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- York v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Watson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.