Legal Opinion

Hammond v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 16, 1971No. 44096-44099PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ODOM, Judge.

The offenses in Cause Numbers 44,096 and 44,097 are unlawful possession of a narcotic drug, to-wit: Heroin; and in Cause Numbers 44,098 and 44,099 are unlawful sale of a narcotic drug, to-wit: Heroin. The punishment was assessed by the court in each case at ten years.

The sole ground of error in each of the cases is that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction and that the state failed to produce any evidence to support appellant’s plea of guilty.

The appellant was represented by counsel of her own choice. Article 1.15 Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. was complied with, as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Menefee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  2. Adam v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Cortez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Christopher Ray Weatherspoon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API