Legal Opinion

Macht v. Estate of Dobkin

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided April 4, 2005No. 034823EPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Burnes, Nonnie S., J.

The defendants, Rosanne Murphy, Estate of Karen Dobkin, Edward M. Stem, and Beth L. Aarons, move for summary judgment on all claims in the plaintiffs, Suzanne Macht, complaint.

For the reasons set forth in this opinion, the defendants’ motions for summary judgment are ALLOWED.

BACKGROUND

In 1984 Karen Dobkin, now deceased, executed a Will wherein she devised her entire estate to her parents and her sister Rosanne Murphy (“1984 Will”). The 1984 Will was properly executed. In the winter of 2002, Dobkin was diagnosed with cancer, and started to reconsider her estate plan.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Cassesso v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. JOSEPH REILLY, STEVEN WENNERS, TERRY PAULSEN, JOANNE LAULETTA and JACKIE KEITH v. LANE, LANE & KELLY LLP, DAVID B. LANE, NINA MARTIN Et A/. @MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON LANE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISSMassachusetts Superior Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API