Parks v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, Judge.
Admittedly appellee has raised serious errors that may have occurred at his sentencing below. These errors, however, were not raised below and were not preserved for appeal. See Maddox v. State, 708 So.2d 617 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. granted, 718 So.2d 169 (Fla.1998).
Although we affirm the sentence below, we acknowledge conflict with Harriel v. State, 710 So.2d 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) and Denson v. State, 711 So.2d 1225 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).
AFFIRMED.
DAUKSCH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Maddox v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Harriel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Denson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
3Cited by5 opinions
- Maddox v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- State v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Parks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Nordheim v. Dept. of Env. ProtectionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Maddox v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000