City of Buffalo v. Hill
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal from municipal court of Buffalo. Action by the city of Buffalo against Burt L. Hill. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtSpring, J.
This action was commenced in the municipal court of the city of Buffalo to recover a penalty of the defendant for selling meats without having procured a license or permit therefor, as required by the ordinances of said city. The charter of the city (chapter 105, Laws 1891) requires the common council to enact ordinances (title 2, c. 1, § 17) “to license and regulate plumbers, auctioneers, butchers, hawkers, peddlers,” etc., and “to regulate * * * the sale of meats, fish, and vegetables.” The common council of the city established four markets located in different parts of the city, and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Matter of Application of JacobsNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- People v. . GillsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- The People v. . MarxNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Forster v. . ScottNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Colon v. . LiskNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- St. Patrick's Church Corporation v. DanielsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- American Baseball Club v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Cutsinger v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- State Ex Rel. Altop v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- Tower Realty, Inc. v. City of East DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.