Legal Opinion

In Re Sherman

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 1, 1926No. 239PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The proceeding below was a reclamation, brought by respondents to recover certain goods by them delivered to the bankrupt shortly before petition filed.

The petition was what is ordinarily called a reclamation, and that in most cases is in legal effect an endeavor to rescind a contract, which is usually a contract of sale.

The court below granted the reclamation; i. e., directed the return to the petitioner respondent of certain goods which had been found by the trustee on the bankrupt’s premises. Whereupon the trustee took this appeal.

We do not think it necessary to recite the testimony at…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Donaldson v. FarwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Donaldson, Assignee v. FarwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. In re American Knit Goods Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
  4. Vedin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919
  5. In re LiebigCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. California Conserving Co. v. D'AVANZOCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  2. In Re Tate-Jones & Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Gordon v. SpaldingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  4. Gordon v. SpaldingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API