Legal Opinion
Lorence v. Astrue
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 23, 2010No. Civil 09-473 (DWF/SRN)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
DONOVAN W. FRANK, District Judge.
The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Susan Richard Nelson dated February 5, 2010. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.
Based on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all of the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. [13]) is GRANTED and the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED.
2.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Sharon K. COX, Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Moore v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Allen R. Prosch v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Faint v. ColvinDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2014
- Bright v. KijakaziDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
- Buckentin v. KijakaziDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
- French v. SaulDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
- Gessner v. BerryhillDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.