Legal Opinion

Fox v. Hohenshelt

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1976PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is a paternity proceeding under ORS 109.125 to have the defendant adjudged to be the father of a child which plaintiff alleges to have been "born out of wedlock” and for an order that defendant pay for the past and future support of the child. Defendant appealed to the Court of Appeals from an adverse judgment.

In support of that appeal defendant contended that plaintiff was not a person authorized to file such a paternity proceeding because she was not "the mother of a child born out of wedlock or a female pregnant with a child who may be bom out of wedlock,” as provided by ORS 109.125,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ColitonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Burke v. BurkeOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Thom v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Moore v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. F. v. H.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ruddock v. OhlsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. State Ex Rel. Adult & Family Services Division v. BradleyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Wolf v. GoinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  4. Baker v. MunroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GridleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API