Legal Opinion

Alexander v. United States

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1990No. Nos. 89-219, 89-220PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The resolution of this case demands that the court address two legal problems. The first is whether we can reach the merits of the case since it apparently involves an attempt to appeal from an order that is not final. We resolve that question by treating the attempted appeal as a petition for a writ of certiorari that has been granted for the purpose of accomplishing an appropriate interlocutory review. The second question presents the case on its merits and requires us to determine whether the doctrine of res judicata forecloses similarly situated parties who did not…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. AdairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Colville Confederated Tribes v. WaltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. Knudson v. HilzerWyoming Supreme Court · 1976

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Big Horn River SystemWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Bredthauer v. Christian, Spring, Seilbach and AssociatesWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  3. In Re the General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Big Horn River SystemWyoming Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API