Legal Opinion
People v. O'LEA
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 25, 1971No. Crim. 17772PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HERNDON, J.
Appellant challenges the validity of the order of the court below entered on October 3, 1969, declaring him to be a mentally disordered sex offender (hereinafter referred to as MDSO) within the meaning of the applicable provisions of the Welfare and Institutions Code and committing him for placement in an institutional unit for the treatment of such offenders in a facility of the Department of Corrections for an indefinite period.
We find no merit in appellant’s contention that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to make the order of commitment because it was not made…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In re GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- In re BevillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- People v. McCrackenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Kinnear v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- In Re KeddyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. CarmonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Hoffman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- (HC) Dearman v. KaplanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Hoffman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981